Allowed

Rishikesh S/O Sh. Tikaram v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC17 Nov 2023CRLMB/14094/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this second bail application, the High Court of Rajasthan allowed the petitioner's plea for regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. without deciding merits, directing his release on a personal bond secured by two sureties subject to compliance with the trial court.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail on personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each.

Rishikesh S/O Sh. Tikaram Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023:RJ-JP:34770]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous II Bail Application No.

¶4

14094/2023

¶5

Rishikesh S/o Sh. Tikaram, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Sarsena, Police Station Todabhim, District Karauli, Rajasthan (At Present Confined In District Jail Dausa)

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶9

Ashok Kumar S/o Umeedilal Meena, R/o Village Churkheda, Mahwa, District Dausa, Rajasthan.

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Satish Khandal, Adv. For : Mr. Atul Sharma, P.P. & Respondent(s) Mr. Kishan Lal Meena, Adv., with Mr. Arvind Balaut, Adv.

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order

¶13

17/11/2023

¶14

This second bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in FIR No.68/2022 registered at Police Station Mahwa, District Dausa for the offence(s) under Section(s) 286, 336, 337 & 308 IPC and under Section 3 of Explosive Substances Act, 1908.

¶15

The first bail application of the accusedpetitioner was dismissed as withdrawn by this Court

¶16

[2023:RJ-JP:34770]

¶17

(2 of 3) [CRLMB-14094/2023]

¶18

vide order dated 29.08.2023, giving liberty to the accused-petitioner to file afresh after filing of the charge sheet.

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that charge sheet has been filed and there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner. He also submits that the accused-petitioner has been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

¶20

Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State as well as the learned counsel for complainant(s) have opposed the bail application.

¶21

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶22

Accordingly, the second bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioner Rishikesh S/o Sh. Tikaram shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two

¶23

[2023:RJ-JP:34770] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-14094/2023]

¶24

sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do

¶25

so.

¶26

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶27

DANISH USMANI /15

Rishikesh S/O Sh. Tikaram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rishikesh S/O Sh. Tikaram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shokat Ali Khan Vs Imran Ali

Smt Chandrawali and Others Vs Royal Sundaram Allianz Ins Co. Ltd. and Ors.

Bala Alias Vimla and Ors. Vs Pradeep Kumar and Ors.

Sanjay Vs Sunil Kumar and Ors.

Raju S/O Shri Surjaram @ Shyojiram Vs State of Rajasthan

Kamla W/O Harishankar Vs State of Rajasthan