Allowed

Sanjay v. Sunil Kumar and Ors.

Rajasthan HC17 Nov 2023CMA/2775/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan allowed an appeal against an order rejecting a civil miscellaneous application in an insurance claim dispute. The court set aside the lower order, directed the insurance company to pay enhanced compensation totaling Rs 4,20,527, and awarded pre-deposit interest.

What did the court decide?

Insurance company to pay Rs 4,20,527 as compensation plus 8% pre-deposit interest till realization.

Sanjay Vs Sunil Kumar and Ors. — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023:RJ-JP:34962]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2775/2017

¶4

Sanjay S/o Debilal Mali, R/o Village Badi, Tehsil Bijay Nagar, District Ajmer

¶5

----Appellant

¶6

Versus

¶7

Sunil Kumar S/o Ram Gopal Dhoot, By Caste Maheshwari, R/o Near Railway Station, Bijay Nagar, District Ajmer Driver Car No. Rj-06-Ca6410

¶8

M/s Maheshwari Fabrics Through Anil Dhoot S/o Ramgopal Dhoot, By Caste Maheshwari, R/o 2Nd Floor, Pur Road, Bhairav Complex, Bhilwara Owner Car No. Rj-06-Ca-6410

¶9

National Insurance Company Limited, Division Office At Kacchari Road, Ajmer Having Its Regional Office At Near Nidhi Bhawan, High Court Circle, C-Scheme, Jaipur Through Its Regional Manager Insurance Company Car No. Rj-06-Ca-6410, Policy No. 35101031136133141155, Valid From 16. 05.2013 To 15.05.2014

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Vinay Mathur, Adv. For : None present Respondent(s)

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶13

Judgment / Order

¶14

17/11/2023

¶15

vihykFkhZ@izkFkhZ@vkgr dh vksj ls ;g vihy vUrxZr /kkjk 173 eksVj okgu vf/kfu;e U;k;ky; eksVj nq?kZVuk nkok vf/kdj.k ¼vij ftyk U;k;k/kh'k la[;k&2½] C;koj

¶16

(2 of 4) [CMA-2775/2017]

¶17

[2023:RJ-JP:34962]

¶18

}kjk Dyse ;kfpdk la[;k 15@2016 esa ikfjr vokMZ o fu.kZ; fnukad 07-03-2017 ls O;fFkr gksdj is'k dh gSA vihyk/khu vokMZ ds ek/;e ls okgu nq?kZVuk esa vihykFkhZ ds vkgr gksus ij fuEu enksa esa dqy 3]46]190@& :i;s izfrdj jkf'k 9 izfr'kr okf"kZd lk/kkj.k C;kt dh nj ls fnyk;s tkus dkvkns'k fn;k x;k gS&

¶19

1-	fpfdRlk O;;	29]050@&
2-	ifjp;Zd O;;	3]500@&
3-	'kY; fpfdRlk O;;	5]000@&
4-	ifjogu O;;	7]940@&
5-	vk; dh {kfr ds en esa ¼18 izfr'kr LFkkbZ fu;ksZX;rk ds vk/kkj ij½58032X16X18%	1]67]132@&
6-	Hkfo"; dh izR;'kk dh en esa 50 izfr'kr	83]566@&
7-	ekufld osnuk ,oa iks"kkgkj ckcr~	20]000@&
8-	'kkjhfjd fu;ksZX;rk ds fy;s	30]000@&
	;ksx	3]46]188@&
	Roundoff	3]46]190@&

¶20

fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dk fuosnu gS fd vkgr@vihykFkhZ Hkkjh okgu ds pkyd ds :i esa dq'ky Jfed Fkk] o"kZ 2014 esa dq'ky Jfed dh U;wure etnwjh izfrfnu 209@& :i;s ds vuqlkj ekfld vk; 6270@& :i;s gksrh gS] ysfdu fo}ku v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k }kjk ;g etnwjh ek= 4836@& :i;s fu/kkZfjr dh gS] vr% bl fcUnq ij vk{ksfir vokMZ vikLr gksdj ;qfDr;qDr izfrdj jkf'k fu/kkZfjr gksuk visf{kr gS] vU; enksa esa Hkh jkf'k vi;kZIr gksuk crkrs gq, c<ksRrjh fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶21

[2023:RJ-JP:34962]

¶22

(3 of 4) [CMA-2775/2017]

¶23

chek dEiuh@izR;FkhZ dze&3 ds ;gka vkjksfir okgu chfer Fkk rFkk uksfVl rkehy gksus ds ckotwn mldh vksj ls dksbZ mifLFkr ugha gSA

¶24

lquk x;k] izLrqr rdksaZ ij fopkj fd;k x;kA

¶25

?kVuk fnukad 04-04-2014 dh gS] rRle; izfrfnu dq'ky etnwj dh U;wure etnwjh 209@& :i;s ds fglkc ls vk; dh {kfr 209X30X12X16X18% = 2]16]691@& gksrh gSA v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k }kjk rRle; izpfyr fof/kd fLFkfr dks ns[krs gq, 50 izfr'kr Hkfo"; esa vk; dh {kfr tksMs tkus dk fu.kZ; fy;k gS ftls chek dEiuh dh vksj ls vFkok fdlh Hkh i{k dh vksj ls pqukSrh ugha nh x;h gSA rnuqlkj bl en esa ;g jkf'k 1]08]346@& :i;s laxf.kr gksrh gS] ,slh fLFkfr esa v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k ds fu.kZ; esa vafdr rkfydk ds fcUnq la[;k 5 o 6 esa izfrdj dh jkf'k 1]67]132@& o 83]566@& fu/kkZfjr dh x;h gS] mlds LFkku ij vihykFkhZ dze'k% 2]16]691@& rFkk 1]08]346@& :i;s izkIr djus dk vf/kdkjh gSA

¶26

tgka rd vU; 'kh"kZ@enksa esa tks izfrdj jkf'k v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k }kjk fu/kkZfjr dh x;h gS] og iw.kZr% ;qfDr;qDr gS ftlesa gLr{ksi fd;s tkus dh vko';drk ugha gSA

¶27

mijksDr foospukuqlkj vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g vihy vkaf'kd :i ls Lohdkj dh tkdj v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k }kjk ikfjr vokMZ o fu.kZ; fnukafdr 07-03-2017 dks mikUrfjr djrs gq, vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd vihykFkhZ dqy izfrdj jkf'k 3]46]190@& :i;s ds LFkku ij dqy 4]20]527@& :i;s izkIr djus dk vf/kdkjh gS] bl vkns'k ds

¶28

[2023:RJ-JP:34962]

¶29

(4 of 4) [CMA-2775/2017]

¶30

ek/;e ls tks izfrdj jkf'k c<k;h x;h gS] ml ij Hkh vihykFkhZ] v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k esa ;kfpdk lafLFkr fd;s tkus dh fnukad ls olwyh rd 8 izfr'kr lk/kkj.k okf"kZd C;kt dh nj ls izkIr djus dk vf/kdkjh gksxk] vk{ksfir vokMZ dh 'ks"k 'krsZa ;Fkkor jgsaxhA

¶31

vkns'k dh izfr ds lkFk v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k dk vfHkys[k vfoyEc ykSVk;k tkosA

¶32

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶33

Mittal /145

Sanjay v. Sunil Kumar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay v. Sunil Kumar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shokat Ali Khan Vs Imran Ali

Smt Chandrawali and Others Vs Royal Sundaram Allianz Ins Co. Ltd. and Ors.

Bala Alias Vimla and Ors. Vs Pradeep Kumar and Ors.

Rishikesh S/O Sh. Tikaram Vs State of Rajasthan

Raju S/O Shri Surjaram @ Shyojiram Vs State of Rajasthan

Kamla W/O Harishankar Vs State of Rajasthan