The High Court dismissed the petitioner's second bail application as infructuous because the trial court had already sentenced the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023/RJJP/010555]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No.1198/2023
Anil Kumar Son Of Jawaharlal, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Kalyanpura, Police Station Srimadhopur, District Sikar (Raj.) (At Present Confined At District Jail Sikar)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Atar Singh Gurjar, Adv. on behalf of Mr. Shamsul Aarefin, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Chandragupt Chopra, Public Prosecutor.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL
Order
12/05/2023
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present second bail application has become infructuous as the present petitioner has been sentenced by the trial court.
In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present second bail application is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J
Ramesh Vaishnav /86
23
Anil Kumar Son Of Jawaharlal
State Of Rajasthan
Bhuvan Goyal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
