Chunnilal v. Dilip Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
Hearing to grant leave to appeal arising from a cheque dishonour case was allowed for the appellant; the appeal will be treated as such.
What did the court decide?
Leave to appeal is allowed; the memo of application is treated as an appeal.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Crml Leave To Appeal No. 373/2019
Chunnilal S/o Sh. Pratap, Aged About 74 Years, By Caste Kumawat, R/o Rani Station, Tehsil Rani, Dist. Pali (Raj.)
----Appellant
Versus
Dilip Kumar S/o Satyadevji, By Caste Darji, R/o Near Ganpati Mandir, Pratap Bazar, Rani Station, Tehsil Rani, P.s. Rani, District Pali, Proprietor, Vishal Timber, Rani, District Pali.
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Bharat Shrimali
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
02/08/2023
- Upon perusal of the judgment impugned, it is revealing that a cheque was allegedly given by the accused-respondent to the petitioner, which upon presentation got dishonoured owing to insufficiency of funds in the account of the accused. There seems reasonable grounds to allow the petitioner to prefer an appeal against the impugned judgment.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Chunnilal S/o Sh. Pratap
- respondent
Dilip Kumar S/o Satyadevji
Coram
FARJAND ALI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLLA/373/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court