Appeals challenging cognizance were filed under the SC/ST Act, though the trial court acted under IPC. The court treated them as Criminal Revision Petitions under Cr.P.C. Sections 397/401 and listed them.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JD:24606]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 336/2023
Khemaram S/o Shri Megharam, Aged About 45 Years, B/c Meghwal, R/o Chak 14 Cwb, Police Station Bajju, District Bikaner (Rajasthan)
----Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 337/2023
Khemaram S/o Shri Megharam, Aged About 45 Years, B/c Meghwal, R/o Chak 14 Cwb, Police Station Bajju, District Bikaner (Rajasthan)
----Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Uttam Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.K. Bhati, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Judgment
01/08/2023
[2023:RJ-JD:24606]
[CRLAS-336/2023]
(2 of 2)
Atrocities) Act, as the learned trial Court took cognizance against the appellant under Section 182/211 of the IPC. The appellant is a member of Schedule Caste and, therefore, the penal provisions of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act are not attracted thus, the appeals are misconceived. Yet feeling that the Courts are meant to impart justice only and not to decide the cases on technicalities; this Court deems it appropriate to consider the instant appeals into Criminal Revision Petitions under Section 397/401 of the Cr.P.C.
(FARJAND ALI),J
254-255Mamta/-
Khemaram S/o Shri Megharam
State Of Rajasthan
Farjand Ali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
