Allowed

Pannalal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC5 Jan 2023CRLLA/6/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur allowed the applications for leave to appeal in two connected matters, finding valid grounds to challenge the acquittal of the respondents and ordering the registration of these as full appeals.

What did the court decide?

S.B. Crml. Leave To Appeal No. 411/2018 and No. 6/2019 allowed; memos treated as appeals and registered; amended cause title to be filed within two weeks.

Pannalal Vs State of Rajasthan — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Crml Leave To Appeal No. 411/2018

¶3

Pannalal S/o Sh. Balu @ Birbal, Aged About 67 Years, By Caste Sansi, Resident Of Dablibas Chaina (Dablibas Sardara) (Noorpura), Tehsil And District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶4

----Appellant

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Public Prosecutor 2. Soniya Ram S/o Sukha Ram, By Caste Sansi, Resident Of Village Kamana, P/s Hanumangarh Junction, Tehsil And District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan)

¶7

----Respondents

¶8

Connected With

¶9

S.B. Crml Leave To Appeal No. 6/2019

¶10

Pannalal S/o Balu @ Birbal Sansi, Aged About 67 Years, Dablibas Chaina (Dablibas Sardara) (Noorpura), Teh And Dist Hanumangarh Raj.

¶11

----Appellant

¶12

Versus

¶13

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp 2. Harchand S/o Balu @ Ballu Sansi, Aged About 46 Years, Village Dablibas Chugta (Kamana), Ps Hanumangarh Junction, Teh And Dist Hanumangarh (Raj)

¶14

Lakhuram S/o Balu @ Ballu Sansi, Aged About 38 Years, Village Dablibas Chugta (Kamana), Ps Hanumangarh Junction, Teh And Dist Hanumangarh (Raj)

¶15

Kishnaram S/o Kurdaram Sansi, Aged About 39 Years, Village Dablibas Chugta (Kamana), Ps Hanumangarh Junction, Teh And Dist Hanumangarh (Raj)

¶16

----Respondents

¶17

For Appellant(s) : Mr. KR Saharan For Respondent(s) : Mr. SS Rajpurohit, PP Mr. NL Joshi

¶18

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

(2 of 2)

[CRLLA-411/2018]

Order

05/01/2023

Heard learned Public Prosecutor and perused the judgment impugned.

¶24

This Court is of the opinion that there are valid and substantial grounds for grant of leave to the appellant applicant for filing an appeal against the acquittal of the respondents vide impugned judgment.

¶25

Accordingly, the applications for grant of leave to appeal are allowed. The memo of leave to appeal be treated as an appeal and it be registered as such. Amended cause title be filed within two weeks.

¶26

(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J

¶27

50-Arti/-

Pannalal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pannalal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. Vs Premchand

Khem Chand Vs State of Rajasthan

Mangturam Vs State of Rajasthan

Karanpuri Vs State of Rajasthan

Nitin Arora Vs Sayeed Rohit @ Bunti

Dinesh Vs State of Rajasthan