Dismissed

Sitaram Son of Shri Chhotulal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC4 Jul 2023CRLBC/24/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In S.B. Criminal Bail Cancellation Application No. 24/2023, the High Court of Rajasthan considered a petition challenging an order granting anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC in a cheating and criminal conspiracy case.

What did the court decide?

The petition for cancellation of anticipatory bail was dismissed; the earlier order granting anticipatory bail was affirmed against both sides.

Sitaram Son of Shri Chhotulal Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Bail Cancellation Application No. 24/2023

¶3

Sitaram Son Of Shri Chhotulal, Resident Of Mandi Road, Dausa, Tehsil Dausa, District Dausa (Raj.)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶7

Sugna W/o Ramdhan, Resident Of Kanpura, Tehsil Nangal Rajawatan, District Dausa (Raj)

¶8

----Respondents

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Girjesh Chaturvedi, Adv. For : Mr. Sanjeev Mahala, PP Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Paliwal, Adv.

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶11

Order

¶12

04/07/2023

¶13

;kph&ifjoknh dh vksj ls tekur fujLrhdj.k vkosnu bl U;k;ky; }kjk iqfyl Fkkuk&ukaxy jktkorku ftyk&nkSlk esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 62@2022 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 420] 409] 427] 120ch Hkk-na-la- ls lacaf/kr ,dyihB nkafMd fofo/k tekur vkosnu la[;k 15327@2022 esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 12-01-2023 ftlds ek/;e ls vfHk;qDr lqxuk dk vfxze tekur vkosnu vUrxZr /kkjk 438 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk Lohdkj fd;k x;k] dks fujLr fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk ds lkFk is'k fd;k x;k gSA

¶14

(2 of 2) [CRLBC-24/2023]

¶15

fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph&ifjoknh dk fuosnu gS fd rF;ksa dks Nqikdj ;g tekur lqfo/kk izkIr dh x;h gS] vr% iwoZ esa nh x;h tekur dh lqfo/kk fujLr dh tkos tcfd fo}ku vf/koDrk vfHk;qDr dk fuosnu gS fd nksuksa i{kksa dh mifLFkfr esa lHkh rF;ksa ij fopkj djus ds mijkUr vfxze tekur dh lqfo/kk iznku dh x;h gSA

¶16

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us fof/k&lEer vkns'k ikfjr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶17

lquk x;k] izLrqr rdksaZ ij fopkj fd;k x;kA

¶18

nksuksa i{kksa ds e/; lEifRr ds fodz; vuqcU/k dks ysdj fookn gksus dh fLFkfr dks ns[krs gq, lHkh lqlaxr lkexzh ij fopkj djus ds mijkUr rFkk nksuksa i{kksa dks lquus ds i'pkr vfHk;qDr dks vfxze tekur dh lqfo/kk iznku dh x;h Fkh] fdlh Hkh i{kdkj }kjk dksbZ rF; lkjoku :i ls Nqik;k x;k gks vFkok vfLrRoghu rF;ksa ij U;k;ky; }kjk fopkj fd;k x;k gks] ,slh fLFkfr ugha gSA

¶19

vr% lEiw.kZ ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks ns[krs gq, ifjoknh dh vksj ls izLrqr tekur fujLrhdj.k vkosnu Lohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; mfpr izrhr ugha gksrk gSA

¶20

ifj.kker% izLrqr tekur fujLrhdj.k vkosnu vUrxZr /kkjk 439¼2½ [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA

¶21

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶22

Mittal /4

Sitaram Son of Shri Chhotulal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sitaram Son of Shri Chhotulal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Darab Singh S/O Haroli Vs State of Rajasthan

Mehboob Khan S/O Chaw Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Jai Singh S/O Sukhdev Vs State of Rajasthan

Mukesh Upadhyay S/O Ramkaran Upadhyay Vs State of Rajasthan

Vishnu S/O Deendayal Vs State of Rajasthan

Keshar Dev S/O Rameswarlal Vs State of Rajasthan