examination, insofar as relevant, he has denied any previous disputes between the accused party and the complainant's party. He has only stated that there was a dispute between the deceased Savantaram and Megharam. In his cross-examination, he denied the presence of eyewitnesses PW-7 Harisingh and PW-8 Ranulal. He has also denied that he gave the statement (Exhibit-D/1) stating the existence of Harisingh and Ranulal at the place of occurrence and denied any injuries caused to Megharam, Baburam, Gangaram and Panaram. It is also pertinent to mention here that Exhibit-P/1 says that when the complainant's party reached the well, accused Megharam, Bhomaram, Gangaram, Munaram, Baburam, Kojaram, Laduram, Manganram, Bhomaram, Himtaram and Pannaram were present with the arms in their hands and they attacked the complainant's party, however, in his court statement PW-1 Khiyanram expressed that the altercation occurred due to abuse by Laduram to the deceased Savantaram. In contrast, in the F.I.R., it has been stated that when the complainant's party reached the well, the accused Megharam, Bhomaram, Gangaram, Munaram, Baburam, Kojaram, Laduram, Manganram, Bhomaram, Himtaram and Pannaram were present with the arms in their hands. They suddenly attacked the complainant's party.
