The High Court of Rajasthan, Jodhpur allowed restoration applications under Section 5 of the Limitation Act read with Order 41 Rule 19 C.P.C. and Section 151 CPC. The court condoned the delay and restored the accompanying Civil Misc. Appeal No.282/2016 to its original status.
Restoration of S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.282/2016 to its original number.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Restoration No. 23/2023
In
S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.282/2016
Chameli Devi
----Petitioner
Versus
Vishnu Kumar Prajapat
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. RS Mankad For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ayush Goyal
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS
Order
25/08/2023
Heard on applications under Section 5 of the Limitation Act & under Order 41 Rule 19 read with Section 151 C.P.C. for restoration of Civil Misc. Appeal No.282/2016.
For the reasons mentioned in the applications, the same are allowed. The delay caused in filing the restoration application is condoned.
Accordingly, the accompanying S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.282/2016 is restored to its original number.
Office to proceed.
(MADAN GOPAL VYAS),J
86-Bharti/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the application for restoration of the civil appeal should be condoned.
Whether the applications for restoration under Section 5 of the Limitation Act read with Order 41 Rule 19 C.P.C. should be allowed.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Chameli Devi
Vishnu Kumar Prajapat
Madan Gopal Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
