Sayam Bajaj v. Twinkle
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the civil revision petition. The court granted the prayer and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn along with stay petition and pending applications.
What did the court decide?
Permission to withdraw the petition granted; citation dismissed as withdrawn with other pending applications.
What the court decided
[2023:RJ-JD:21812]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 85/2023
Sayam Bajaj S/o Shri Sandeep Bajaj, Aged About 33 Years, Resident Of House No. 153, Teliya Wali Gali No. 2, Sirsa, Haryana.
----Petitioner
Versus
Twinkle W/o Shri Sayam Bajaj, Aged About 29 Years, D/o Shri Aswani Wats, Resident Of House No. 06-P-41, Jawahar Nagar, Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Saurabh Soni for Mr. NK Sharma
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA Order
17/07/2023
- Vide order dated 13.07.2023, after hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, the Court specifically found that the order impugned does not suffer from any illegality or infirmity. However, learned counsel for the petitioner prayed for time to complete his instructions. In view of the same, the matter was directed to be listed today.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sayam Bajaj
- respondent
Twinkle
Coram
Rekha Borana
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CR/85/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court