The High Court dismissed the civil first appeal as having abated. The court found the appellant firm closed and the proprietor deceased, with no substitution of legal representatives, constituting abandonment and non-prosecution.
The appeal was dismissed as having abated and also for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JD:21941]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 150/1993
Firm Jagdish Asharam And Anr.
----Appellants
Versus
Jai Narayan And Anr.
----Respondents
| For Appellant(s) | : Nonepresent |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Jitendra Chopra |
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA
Order
17/07/2023
[2023:RJ-JD:21941]
[CFA-150/1993]
(2 of 2)
(REKHA BORANA),J
249-T.Singh/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present appeal should be dismissed as having abated and for non-prosecution.
Firm Jagdish Asharam And Anr.
Jai Narayan And Anr.
Rekha Borana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
