Kishanlal v. Narulal
Case brief
What is this about?
A civil revision petition filed under Order VII Rule 11 CPC against a rejection of a defendant's application was not pressed by the learned counsel for the petitioners and was dismissed accordingly.
What did the court decide?
The revision petition and the stay petition were dismissed as not pressed.
What the court decided
[2023/RJJD/004801]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 20/2023
- Kishanlal S/o Shri Payarchand Sanadhya, Aged About 64 Years, Resident of Rajyawas, Tehsil and District Rajsamand (Rajasthan)
- Puran S/o Shri Kishanlal Sanadhya, Aged About 35 Years, Resident of Rajyawas, Tehsil and District Rajsamand (Rajasthan)
- Rekha W/o Shri Puran Sanadhya, Aged About 32 Years, Resident of Rajyawas, Tehsil and District Rajsamand (Rajasthan)
----Petitioners
Versus
- Narulal S/o Heera Ji Regar, Resident of Rajyawas, Tehsil and District Rajsamand (Rajasthan)
- Assistant Engineer Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Rajyawas, Tehsil and District Rajsamand (Rajasthan)
- Assistant Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department, Rajyawas, Tehsil and District Rajsamand (Rajasthan)
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the revision petition should be dismissed when the petitioner seeks to not press it.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kishanlal S/o Shri Payarchand Sanadhya
- petitioner
Puran S/o Shri Kishanlal Sanadhya
- petitioner
Rekha W/o Shri Puran Sanadhya
- respondent
Narulal S/o Heera Ji Regar
- respondent
Assistant Engineer Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- CR/20/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court