Varda v. Jagdish
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil Appeal disposed as compromise regarding satisfaction of decree settlement between parties.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was disposed of in terms of the compromise dated 03.01.2009 as the decree amount was paid.
What the court decided
[2023/RJJD/004128]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 103/2006
Varda S/o Shri Kishna Jat, aged about 75 years, R/o Gayatri Nagar, Mawli, District Udaipur.
----Appellant
Versus
Shri Jagdish S/o Shri Nathu Lal Nai, R/o Village Nai, presently Dudhiya Ganeshi, Aklavya Colony, Malla Talai, Udaipur.
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Suresh Shrimali For Respondent(s) : Mr. B.K. Bhatnagar
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA Order 06/02/2023
An application has been preferred on behalf of the appellant with a submission that a compromise has been entered into between the parties and in terms of the compromise dated 03.01.2009, the complete decreetal amount has been paid to the respondent Jagdish. A receipt of the same has also been placed on record. It has therefore, been prayed that the present appeal be disposed of in terms of the compromise.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Varda S/o Shri Kishna Jat
- respondent
Shri Jagdish S/o Shri Nathu Lal Nai
Coram
Rekha Borana
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- CFA/103/2006
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court