Rekha v. Balmukund
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court discussed an appeal against the dismissal of an interim injunction application. Since the underlying civil suit has been pending since 2012, the court directed the trial court to dispose of it within one year and maintained the status quo.
What did the court decide?
The trial court is directed to decide the pending civil suit within one year; parties are directed to maintain the status quo regarding the disputed property until then.
What the court decided
[2023:RJ-JD:29522]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 81/2021
Rekha D/o Shri Bhanwar Lal Mehta W/o Shri Dilip Kumar Kanthed, Aged About 49 Years, R/o 2-B-49, Sengwa Housing Board , Senti Distt. Chittorgarh .
----Appellant
Versus
Balmukund S/o Shri Roop Lal Menariya, R/o Menariya Medical Store , Collectorate Circle , Chittorgarh
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. SL Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. NK Rastogi
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS
Judgment
13/09/2023
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the dismissal of the interim injunction application by the trial court.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Rekha D/o Shri Bhanwar Lal Mehta W/o Shri Dilip Kumar Kanthed
- respondent
Balmukund S/o Shri Roop Lal Menariya
Coram
Madan Gopal Vyas
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CMA/81/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court