Therefore, income of the claimant is assessed as Rs.2190/- per month i.e. Rs.26280/- per annum. It is also admitted position that as per the disability certificate (Ex.13), claimant had suffered permanent physical disability to the extent of 80% but the tribunal wrongly considered it as a 40%. The said disability certificate has been issued by a duly constituted Medical Board. The claimant was examined as AW1 before the tribunal. In his statement, he categorically stated that at the time of accident he was earning Rs.25,000/- per month by milk dairy and rachka business. He further stated that he was having 13 buffalows which were being cared by him and he was selling their milk. On account of amputation of his land in the accident, he had to sell his all buffalows and in the absence of his leg, he can not do agriculture and dairy business and he has become permanently disabled. The insurance company did not produce any evidence in rebuttal thereof. In the absence of any contrary evidence available on record, in my considered view the injury caused to the claimant was in relation to his whole body particularly when the leg of the claimant was amputated and he had become permanently disabled. Keeping in view the fact that the claimant had suffered 80% permanent disability, therefore, in the light of the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in National Insurance Company Limited Vs. Pranay Sethi & Ors., reported in AIR 2017 SC 5157, an addition of 40% of the aforesaid income is to be added towards future prospects of the claimant. Thus, the annual income of the claimant comes to Rs.29,434/- (21024 + 8410). Keeping in view the age of the claimant at the time of accident, multiplier of 17 would be applied to work out the compensation. In this way, the
