Ravi Kumar v. Indraj
Case brief
What is this about?
Held appellant as correct in reduced income criterion for enhanced pension benefits. Enhanced compensation amounts granted for death, presumptive death, and medical treatment based on Malarvizhi guidelines dismiss insurance objection.
What did the court decide?
Compensation enhanced to 40,29,960/- including 40,000/- family aid, 15,000/- legal aid, and 15,000/- rehabilitation. Original compensation order quashed.
What the court decided
[2023:RJ-JP:39109]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 3274/2013
- Ravi Kumar (DIED)
- Seema Meena, Daughter Of Kailash Chand Meena, Aged 26 Years, Resident Of House No. 32, Ward No. 44, Shankar Nagar, Behind Jaisalmer House, Naya Ghar Gulabbari, Kalyanipura Road, Ajmer Also At B-64, Kusum Vihar, Jagatpura, Jaipur
----Appellants
Versus
- Indraj Singh S/o Jagan Ram, Aged 29 Years, R/o Village Dal Mas, Police Station Laxmangarh, District Sikar. (Driver)
- Jagdish Prasad Ola S/o Bega Ram, Aged 47 years, R/o Village Kudli, P.s. Raghunathgarh, District Sikar. (Owner)
- Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Division Office Kachari Road, Ajmer Having Its Regional Office At Anand Bhawan, Sansar Chandra Road, Jaipur Through Its Regional Manager. (Insurance Company)
----Respondents
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether actual pension income should be deducted while determining reduced income for consequential reliefs under pension criteria.
Whether deemed death pension and increased compensation amounts due to presumptive death should be enhanced pursuant to precedent.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Seema Meena
- respondent
Indraj Singh
- respondent
Jagdish Prasad Ola
- respondent
Oriental Insurance Company Limited
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- CMA/3274/2013
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court