The High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur dismissed a civil miscellaneous appeal for want of prosecution as the appellant failed to appear despite notices issued, with no represented counsel showing up.
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JD:26050]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 232/2001
Ram Chandra
----Appellant
Versus
Smt. Shakuntla And Ors
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : None present For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS Order 17/08/2023
On 3.11.2020, this Court ordered to issue notice of date of hearing to the appellant as both the learned counsel representing the appellant i.e., Mr. JM Bhandari and Mr. BL Darji were no more. 2. In pursuance of the aforesaid order, the notices were sent to the appellant. However, the office report shows that notices of information to appellant were received unserved for want of correct address as no-one recognized the appellant on given address.
posted for 24.4.2023 for hearing.
proceed with the present appeal.
(MADAN GOPAL VYAS),J
312-CPGoyal/-
Ram Chandra
Smt. Shakuntla And Ors
Madan Gopal Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
