This is a civil miscellaneous appeal where the appellant failed to appear despite multiple reminders. The High Court held that the appeal was abandoned and dismissed it for want of prosecution.
Civil Misc. Appeal No. 1895/2018 dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JD:32279]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 1895/2018
----Appellants
Versus
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : None present For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS Order
03/10/2023
Nobody has appeared on behalf of appellant even in the second round. Nobody appeared on behalf of the appellant on 26.09.2023 and 14.09.2023.
(2 of 2)
[2023:RJ-JD:32279]
[CMA-1895/2018]
It appears that the appellant does not want to prosecute the present Civil Misc. Appeal.
Accordingly, the Civil Misc. Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(MADAN GOPAL VYAS),J
76-neha/-
State of Rajasthan through the District Collector, Sriganganagar
Smt. Sharda Devi W/o Late Shri Poorna Ram
Madan Gopal Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
