Rajasthan High Court dismissed a civil miscellaneous appeal for want of prosecution as the appellant failed to appear despite notices.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JD:32283]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 1044/2001
Ghishi Bai W/o Late Sh. Sohansingh, Age 45 age, R/o Kalaji Mandir K Pass, Salumber, District Jaipur (Raj.)
----Appellant
Versus
----Respondent
| For Appellant(s) | : Nonepresent |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Deepak Vyas on behalf of Mr. |
| Jagdish Vyas |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS Order
03/10/2023
Nobody has appeared on behalf of appellant even in the second round. Nobody appeared on behalf of the appellant on 12.05.2023 and 22.04.2022.
It appears that the appellant does not want to prosecute the present Civil Misc. Appeal.
Accordingly, the Civil Misc. Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(MADAN GOPAL VYAS),J
5-neha/-
Ghishi Bai
The New India Insurance Co Ltd
Sanjay Kumar
Jabbar Khan
Madan Gopal Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
