Jagdish v. Rampratap
Case brief
What is this about?
In this civil miscellaneous appeal, the High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur observed that the original order remained effective and did not dispose of the matter substantively.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 1040/2023
Jagdish S/o Shri Sajanram, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Chak 9 Dwm Tehsil Rawatsar, District Hanumangarh.
----Appellant
Versus
- Rampratap S/o Shri Chataruram, R/o Chak 7 Rwm Tehsil Rawatsar Distt Hanumangarh At Present Residing At Firm Shri Mangalrao Trading Company Shop No 01 Dhanmandi Tehsil Rawatsar, District Hanumangarh.
- Sub-Registrar, Tehsil Rawatsar, Distt Hanumangarh.
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr. RC Joshi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Jain
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT Order
14/08/2023
1- vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls ;g vihy vUrxZr vkns'k 43 fu;e 1 o 2 flfoy izfØ;k lafgrk ds rgr fo}ku v/khuLFk U;k;ky; vij ftyk U;k;k/kh'k] la[;k 1] uksgj] ftyk guqekux<] jktLFkku }kjk fofo/k nhokuh lhvkbZ,l izdj.k la[;k 22@2023] txnh'k cuke jkeizrki oxSjk esa izLrqr izkFkZuk&i= varxZr vkns'k 39 fu;e 1 o 2 flfoy izfØ;k lafgrk esa ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 03-06-2023 ls O;fFkr gksdj is'k dh x;h gSA
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Jagdish S/o Shri Sajanram
- respondent
Rampratap S/o Shri Chataruram
- respondent
Sub-Registrar, Tehsil Rawatsar
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- CMA/1040/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court