Surta Ram v. Jora Ram and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution after noting the absence of the appellant and lack of prior appearance on multiple dates.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 95/1992
Surta Ram
----Appellant
Versus
Jora Ram And Anr.
----Respondent
| For Appellant(s) | : Nonepresent |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Nonepresent |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS
Order
07/08/2023
No one has appeared on behalf of both the parties today. No one from appellant side had appeared on earlier dates i.e. 17.05.2023, 04.04.2023, 06.09.2022, 27.07.2022 & 21.07.2022. It appears that the appellant does not want to prosecute the present Civil First Appeal.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Surta Ram
- respondent
Jora Ram And Anr.
Coram
Madan Gopal Vyas
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- CFA/95/1992
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court