Gurdeep Singh v. State of Rajasthan
Case brief
What is this about?
Court addressed clerical error in a previous order's header where 'Jodhpur' was incorrectly replaced by 'Bikaner' due to a technical command, directing correction on the High Court website and notice to publishers.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 767/2022
Gurdeep Singh S/o Gurnam Singh, Aged About 45 Years, R/o 10 P, Tehsil Anoopgarh, District Sri Ganganagar.
----Petitioner
| Versus |
|---|
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
| ----Respondent | |
|---|---|
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. SK Verma |
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi,PP |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS (Suo Motu)
Order
29/09/2023
On 27.9.2023, it was brought to my notice that in the order dated 04.08.2023 passed by me in SB Cr. Misc. Petition No.767/2022 (Gurdeep Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan), after the words “HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT” appearing in the header of judgment, “ Bikaner ” has been mentioned instead of “ JODHPUR ” by the Junior Personal Assistant concerned.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Gurdeep Singh
- respondent
State of Rajasthan
Coram
Madan Gopal Vyas
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMP/767/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court