In a first appeal, the High Court held that no application for taking legal representatives on record was filed after the appellant was reported to have died, and thus the appeal was dismissed as having abated.
The appeal was dismissed as it abated due to the death of the appellant without filing a representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023/RJJP/008732]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 120/2017
Smt. Champa Devi W/o Sh. Harish Chand, R/o Palbichala, Ajmer At Present Ambedkar Colony Gulab Badi Kiranipura, Ajmer
----Appellant
Versus
Smt. Saraswati Devi W/o Nathulal, R/o Mistry Mohalla, Gulab Badi, Ajmer
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Pradeep Chaudhary, Adv. Mr. Karan Audichya, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Harshad Kapoor, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
Order
01/05/2023
Learned counsel for the respondent submits that despite the information given by him that the appellant died, learned counsel for the appellant has not filed any application for taking appellant’s LRs on record.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he had no information regarding legal heirs of appellant-Smt. Champa Devi because none had contacted him.
In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed as having been abated.
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J
Jatin /12
Smt. Champa Devi
Smt. Saraswati Devi
Narendra Singh Dhaddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
