Contempt petition against failure to remove encroachments after the order of 06.04.2023. Court held petition frivolous as no time-bound direction was given in the original order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 804/2023
In
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5086/2023
Devaram S/o Laduram, Aged About 62 Years, R/o Kotadi Tehsil Sarwar District Ajmer
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ved Pal Shastri Advocate
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order
18/08/2023
Heard.
This contempt petition has been preferred on the allegation that after the order was passed by this Court on 06.04.2023, encroachments have not been removed.
The order was passed on 06.04.2023. No time bound direction has been given. In para 3 of the order, it was clearly stated that the order is executable.
The contempt petition is frivolous and the same is, accordingly, dismissed.
(ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J
(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),J
SANJAY KUMAWAT-5
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition lodged alleging failure to remove encroachments is maintainable.
Whether the order passed on 06.04.2023 was executable even without a time-bound direction.
Devaram S/o Laduram
Smt. Usha Sharma
Bharati Deekshit
Vikas Bharati
Rahul Pareek
Ganesh Kachchhawa
ASHUTOSH KUMAR
MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
