Coram allowed a correction in the order dated 09.12.2022 to add the counsel for the respondent, who was mistakenly omitted despite being present in court.
The name of Mr. Mahesh Thanvi is to be read as counsel for the respondents in the order dated 09.12.2022.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Misc. Application No. 384/2022
IN
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5394/2010
M/s. B.J. Woollens Mill Pvt. Ltd.
----Petitioner
Versus
Rajasthan State Industrial Development and Investment Corporation Ltd. & Anr.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahesh Thanvi
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order
16/12/2022
The case comes up on an application for correction in the order dated 09.12.2022 passed by this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5394/2010.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that despite his presence in the Court, inadvertently, the name of learned counsel for the respondent has not been shown in the order dated 09.12.2022.
For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed.
Let the name of Mr. Mahesh Thanvi be read as counsel for the respondents in the order dated 09.12.2022.
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J
C4-KashishS/-
M/s. B.J. Woollens Mill Pvt. Ltd.
Rajasthan State Industrial Development and Investment Corporation Ltd.
Vinit Kumar Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
