The High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur, hearing a writ restoration application (S.B. Writ Restoration No. 148/2015) in the case of Sattar Khan versus Smt. Nojji Devi and Ummeda Ram, held that the application became infructuous and was accordingly dismissed.
The writ restoration application was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Writ Restoration No. 148/2015
In
S. B. Civil Writ Petition No.9168/2013
Sattar Khan son of Shri Akbar Khan, by caste Teli, aged about 54 years, resident of Tilak Nagar, Barmer City, Distirct-Barmer.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amit Mehta
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order
15/12/2022
Learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner submits that the present writ restoration application has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the present writ restoration application is dismissed as rendered infructuous.
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J
275-Shahenshah/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ restoration application was renderred infructuous and if so, whether it should be dismissed.
Sattar Khan
Smt. Nojji Devi
Ummeda Ram
Vinit Kumar Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
