In a S.B. Writ Contempt petition alleging non-compliance, the High Court at Jodhpur observed that the respondents had made due compliance and tendered an unconditional apology. Consequently, the court was not inclined to continue proceedings and discharged the notices.
Notices of contempt discharged and petition disposed of for statistical purposes.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Writ Contempt No. 92/2021
Usha Garoda D/o Shri Santosh Das Garoda, Aged About 40 Years, Resident Of Nagauri Gate, Jodhpur At Present House No. 129, Ward No. 29, Hudco Colony Nimach (M.p.).
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. |
Vishal Sharma |
|---|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Mr. |
K.S. Rajpurohit, AAG Rajat Arora |
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
11/02/2022
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that due compliance of the order, non-compliance whereof has been alleged, has been made.
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the aforesaid fact.
(2 of 2)
[WCP-92/2021]
In view of the aforesaid and in view of the unconditional apology tendered by the respondents, this Court is not inclined to continue with the present contempt proceedings.
Notices of contempt are hereby discharged.
The contempt petition stands disposed of for statistical purposes.
(DINESH MEHTA),J 57-jayesh/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether contempt proceedings should be continued given the unconditional apology tendered by the respondents.
Usha Garoda
State Of Rajasthan
Dinesh Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
