In this writ contempt petition, a driver of an ambulance company challenged officials. Upon submission of compliance and an unconditional apology by respondents, the High Court discharged the contempt notices and disposed of the petition.
Notices of contempt discharged and petition disposed of on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Writ Contempt No. 175/2017
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
(2 of 2)
[WCP-175/2017]
| For Petitioner(s) | : | Ms. Anjali Kaushik for Mr. SK Verma |
|---|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : | Mr. KS Rajpurohit, AAG, through VC Mr. Rahul Vyas for |
| Mr. KuldeepMathur,Sr. Advocate |
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
11/02/2022
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that due compliance of the order, non-compliance whereof has been alleged, has been made.
Learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the aforesaid fact.
In view of the aforesaid and in view of the unconditional apology tendered by the respondents, this Court is not inclined to continue with the present contempt proceedings.
Notices of contempt are hereby discharged.
The contempt petition stands disposed of for statistical purposes.
(DINESH MEHTA),J
3-pooja/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether contempt proceedings should be continued in view of unconditional apology and compliance with the prior order.
Whether the contempt petition warrants the discharge of notices.
Ram Chandar S/o Sujaram
Rajendra Kumar S/o Trilok Ram
Dr. Naveen Jain
DINESH MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
