A Division Bench dismissed this revision petition on the ground that the issue was already decided by the High Court in a previous judgment involving similar facts.
Petition dismissed on the ground of issue no longer res integra following earlier decision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Sales Tax (VAT) Revision Petition No. 69/2021
Assistant Commissioner, Commercial Taxes Department, Circle - B, Bharatpur.
----Petitioner
Versus
M/s Anita Devi W/o Shri Manish Kumar, House No. 55, New Tata Lines, Golmuri East Singhbhumi, Jamshedpur.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ayush Singh with Mr. Punit Singhvi
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order
16/02/2022
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
Ritu/15
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
D.B. Sales Tax Revision/Reference No. 85/2021 (Assistant Commissioner, Commercial Taxes Officer, Circle-B, Bharatpur Vs. Pawan Bansal)Distinguished¶12
Assistant Commissioner, Commercial Taxes Department, Circle - B, Bharatpur
M/s Anita Devi W/o Shri Manish Kumar
Pankaj Bhandari
Anoop Kumar Dhand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
