Allowed

Sunil Kumar Wilson S/O V.J. Wilson v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC11 Mar 2022SOSR/52/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an application for suspension of sentence combined with a suspended sentence petition, the High Court suspended the sentence awarded in regular case RC No.23/242/2000 and granted bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- along with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each.

What did the court decide?

Sentence suspended during pendency of petition; accused released on bail upon furnishing personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- and two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each.

Sunil Kumar Wilson S/O V.J. Wilson Vs State of… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence Application

¶3

No.52/2022

¶4

¶5

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 303/2022

¶6

Sunil Kumar Wilson S/o V.J. Wilson, Resident Of 5 Ka 51 Shivaji Park, Alwar (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Alwar)

¶7

----Accused/Petitioner

¶8

Versus

¶9

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor

¶10

----Respondent

¶11

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashish Sharma Upadhyay, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ganesh Saini, P.P.

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶13

Order

¶14

11/03/2022

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the parties on the application filed for suspension of sentence and perused the entire material available on record.

¶16

Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that accused-applicant was on bail during trial as well as during pendency of appeal and presently he is behind bars. Learned counsel further submits that final hearing of the petition is likely to take time thus sentence of the accused-applicant may be suspended.

¶17

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer regarding suspension of sentence.

¶18

I have considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties.

¶19

(2 of 2)

¶20

[SOSR-52/2022]

¶21

Without commenting upon the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to suspend the sentence awarded to the applicant. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence awarded by the learned trial Court and affirmed by the learned appellate Court to the extent of modifying the sentence against the accusedapplicant namely, Sunil Kumar Wilson S/o V.J. Wilson in Regular Criminal Case No.23/242/2000 shall remain suspended during pendency of petition and he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/along with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before this court on 13^th April, 2022 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so.

¶22

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶23

DANISH USMANI /41

Sunil Kumar Wilson S/O V.J. Wilson v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunil Kumar Wilson S/O V.J. Wilson v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramkaran S/O Prabhati Lal B/C Bairwa Vs State of Rajasthan

Kalpana Singh Rajawat D/O Sh. Brijraj Singh Rajawat Wife of Dr. Priyankar Singh Vs Priyankar Singh Son of Dr. K.H. Singh

Mohammad Imran Son of Shri Mohammad Jafar Vs State of Rajasthan

Saloni Sagar Singh W/O Dharamveer Singh D/O Shashi Sagar Singh Vs Dharamveer Singh S/O Madan Singh

Vedprakash Sanwariya Son of Shri Ram Prasad Khatik Vs State of Rajasthan

Shyamsunder Son of Shri Hari Singh Vs State of Rajasthan