Allowed

Vedprakash Sanwariya Son of Shri Ram Prasad Khatik v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC11 Mar 2022SOSA/217/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan, Bench at Jaipur, allowed an application for suspension of sentence while perused the material on record regarding bail status and final hearing timeline without commenting on merits, ordering the accused to furnish bond and sureties and appear before the court.

What did the court decide?

Sentence suspended; bail granted with personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 and two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each, with stipulation to appear on 13th April, 2022.

Vedprakash Sanwariya Son of Shri Ram Prasad Khatik Vs… — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail (Suspension of Sentence) Application

¶3

No.217/2022

¶4

¶5

S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 303/2022

¶6

Vedprakash Sanwariya Son of Shri Ram Prasad Khatik, Aged About 54 Years, Resident Of Pahadi, District Bharatpur, At Present Resident Of Thakar Wala Kuwan, Mohalla Akhepura, Alwar, The Then Lower Divisional Clerk, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, Alwar (Raj.) (At Present Accused Appellant Is Confined In Central Jail, Alwar)

¶7

----Accused-Appellant

¶8

Versus

¶9

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Public Prosecutor

¶10

----Respondent

¶11

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Suresh Kumar, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ganesh Saini, P.P.

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶13

Order

¶14

11/03/2022

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the parties on the application filed for suspension of sentence and perused the entire material available on record.

¶16

Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that accused-applicant was on bail during trial and at present he is behind bars. He further submits that final hearing of the appeal is likely to take time thus sentence of the accused-applicant may be suspended.

¶17

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer regarding suspension of sentence.

¶18

(2 of 2)

¶19

[SOSA-217/2022]

¶20

I have considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties.

¶21

Without commenting upon the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to suspend the sentence awarded to the applicant. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence awarded by the learned trial Court to the accused-applicant namely, Vedprakash Sanwariya S/o Shri Ram Prasad Khatik in Criminal Regular Case No.04/2014 (CIS No.9342/2014) shall remain suspended during pendency of appeal and he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/along with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before this court on 13^th April, 2022 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so.

¶22

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶23

DANISH USMANI /40

Vedprakash Sanwariya Son of Shri Ram Prasad Khatik v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vedprakash Sanwariya Son of Shri Ram Prasad Khatik v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramkaran S/O Prabhati Lal B/C Bairwa Vs State of Rajasthan

Kalpana Singh Rajawat D/O Sh. Brijraj Singh Rajawat Wife of Dr. Priyankar Singh Vs Priyankar Singh Son of Dr. K.H. Singh

Mohammad Imran Son of Shri Mohammad Jafar Vs State of Rajasthan

Saloni Sagar Singh W/O Dharamveer Singh D/O Shashi Sagar Singh Vs Dharamveer Singh S/O Madan Singh

Shyamsunder Son of Shri Hari Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Sunil Kumar Wilson S/O V.J. Wilson Vs State of Rajasthan