Pannalal v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court considered an application for suspension of sentences and bail under Section 389 Cr.P.C. during appeal pendency. Court found gaps in prosecution case regarding recoveries and confessed evidence, deeming grounds strong enough to grant suspension and bail.
What did the court decide?
Application allowed; sentences suspended; appellant released on bail on personal bond of Rs.50,000 with two sureties of Rs.25,000 each.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
D.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 896/2021
Pannalal S/o Magharam, Aged About 28 Years, B/c Meghwal, R/o Gram-Lunchh, Teh. Ratangarh, Dist. Churu. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Bikaner).
----Petitioner
Versus
State, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Deepak Choudhary. For Respondent(s) : Mr. B.R. Bishnoi, AGC.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Order
02/03/2022
Heard learned counsel representing the applicant appellant and the learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the impugned Judgment and the material available on record.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellant is entitled to suspension of sentences and release on bail during the pendency of the appeal against conviction.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Pannalal S/o Magharam
- respondent
State
Coram
Sandeep Mehta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- SOSA/896/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court