Allowed

Rahul S/O Rinku Nagar v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC16 Dec 2022SOSA/1611/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application suspending sentence, the High Court allowed the prayer, suspending the awarded sentence of the appellant during the appeal's pendency and ordering his release on bail upon furnishing a personal bond and two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Sentence suspended during appeal pendency; release on bail with personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- and two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each.

Rahul S/O Rinku Nagar Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application (Suspension of Sentence) No. 1611/2022

¶3

¶4

S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 2468/2022

¶5

Rahul S/o Rinku Nagar, R/o Godam Ki Talai Jhalawar, Police Station Kotwali Jhalawar, District Jhalawar (Raj)

¶6

----Appellant

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor

¶9

----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. Pankaj Sharma for Mr. Nitin Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ganesh Saini, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

¶11

Order

¶12

16/12/2022

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the parties on the application filed for suspension of sentence and perused the entire material available on record.

¶14

Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the accused-applicant has falsely been implicated in this case. The accused-applicant has nothing to do with the alleged offences. Learned counsel further submits that applicant was on bail during trial. He further submits that as final hearing of the appeal is likely to take time, thus, sentence of the accused-applicant may be suspended.

¶15

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer regarding suspension of sentence.

¶16

(2 of 2)

¶17

[CRLAS-2468/2022]

¶18

I have considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties.

¶19

Without commenting upon the merits/demerits of the case and considering the arguments advanced by the parties, this Court deems it just and proper to suspend the sentence awarded to the accused-applicant.

¶20

Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence awarded by the learned trial Court to the accused-applicant namely Rahul S/o Rinku Nagar in Sessions Case No.41/2021 (44/2021) (State v. Rahul) shall remain suspended during pendency of the appeal and he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- along with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before this court on 23.01.2023 and thereafter as and when he is called upon to do so.

¶21

(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J

¶22

SAHIL SONI /82

Rahul S/O Rinku Nagar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rahul S/O Rinku Nagar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Surendra S/O Mahaveer Prasad Vs State of Rajasthan

Aarif Khan S/O Late Shri Iliyas Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Ajay Kumar Sharma S/O Late Shri Siyaram Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Ratti S/O Late Shri Vs State of Rajasthan

Subhash @ Chintu S/O Late Shri Mahaveer Vs State of Rajasthan

Dharmendra Singh Son of Shri Chandan Singh Vs State of Rajasthan