Allowed

Dharmendra Singh Son of Shri Chandan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC16 Dec 2022CRLMB/17427/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed bail to Dharmendra Singh in an offence under the Rajasthan Excise Act. The court held that the petitioner was falsely implicated, the case is exclusively triable by the Magistrate, and further incarceration would be futile.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted; petitioner to furnish a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each.

Dharmendra Singh Son of Shri Chandan Singh Vs State of… — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 17427/2022

¶3

Dharmendra Singh Son Of Shri Chandan Singh, Resident Of Village Babupura, Police Station Mania, District Dholpur (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Dholpur).

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶7

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dushyant Jain for Mr. Anil Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. C.G. Chopra, PP

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

¶9

Order

¶10

16/12/2022

¶11

The instant bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of accused-petitioner against the impugned order dated 25.11.2022 passed by learned Court below for the offence under Section 19/54 of the Rajasthan Excise Act in FIR No.401/2022, registered at Police Station Mania, District Dholpur.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. The accused-petitioner has nothing to do with the alleged offences. He is behind the bars since long time. The case is exclusively triable by the Court of Magistrate. Trial of the case is likely to take a long time to conclude and till then, his further incarceration would not serve any fruitful purpose. He is ready and willing to furnish bail bonds

¶13

(2 of 2)

¶14

[CRLMB-17427/2022]

¶15

for his release. Therefore, the bail application deserves to be allowed.

¶16

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶17

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.

¶18

Taking into consideration the submissions put forth and overall facts and circumstances of the case but without commenting upon detailed merits of the case, this Court deems it fit to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.

¶19

Therefore, the bail application is allowed. Accused-petitioner Dharmendra Singh Son Of Shri Chandan Singh shall be released on bail, if he is not required in any other case, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Fifty Thousand) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/(Twenty-five Thousand) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any other court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when he is called upon to do so.

¶20

(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J

¶21

SAHIL SONI /300

Dharmendra Singh Son of Shri Chandan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dharmendra Singh Son of Shri Chandan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Surendra S/O Mahaveer Prasad Vs State of Rajasthan

Aarif Khan S/O Late Shri Iliyas Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Ajay Kumar Sharma S/O Late Shri Siyaram Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Rahul S/O Rinku Nagar Vs State of Rajasthan

Ratti S/O Late Shri Vs State of Rajasthan

Subhash @ Chintu S/O Late Shri Mahaveer Vs State of Rajasthan