Allowed

Ankit Kumar Son of Shri Tularam Jatav v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC8 Feb 2022SOSA/146/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge of the Rajasthan High Court at Jaipur considered an application for suspension of sentence pending appeal in a criminal case. Despite opposition from the Public Prosecutor, the court suspended the sentence and granted bail with a personal bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Sentence suspended during pendency of appeal; accused released on bail with bond of Rs.1,00,000/ and two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each.

Ankit Kumar Son of Shri Tularam Jatav Vs… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence Application

¶3

No.146/2022

¶4

¶5

S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 218/2022

¶6

Ankit Kumar Son of Shri Tularam Jatav, Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of Ganv Rawli, (Rafiul Nagar) Police Station Mandawar, District Bijnor, Uttarpradesh.

¶7

----Accused-Appellant

¶8

Versus

¶9

State of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶10

----Respondent

¶11

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Pawan Kumar Verma, through VC For Respondent(s) : Mr. Riyasat Ali, P.P.

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶13

Order

¶14

08/02/2022

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the accused-applicant as well as learned Public Prosecutor on the application filed for suspension of sentence and perused the entire material available on record.

¶16

Learned counsel for accused-applicant submits that the applicant was on bail during trial and his sentence has already been suspended by the learned trial Court. Learned counsel further submits that final hearing of the appeal is likely to take time thus sentence of the accused-applicant may be suspended.

¶17

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer regarding suspension of sentence.

¶18

I have considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties.

¶19

(2 of 2)

¶20

[SOSA-146/2022]

¶21

Without commenting upon the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to suspend the sentence awarded to the applicant. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence awarded by the learned trial Court to the accused-applicant namely, Ankit Kumar S/o Shri Tularam Jatav in Sessions Case No.72/2019 shall remain suspended during pendency of appeal and he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- along with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before this court on 10^th March, 2022 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so.

¶22

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶23

DANISH USMANI /35

Ankit Kumar Son of Shri Tularam Jatav v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ankit Kumar Son of Shri Tularam Jatav v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nand Bihari S/O Heera Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Devendra Kumar @ Debu S/O Padam Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Vijay Singh Son of Shri Badri Prasad Vs Anil Sharma Son of Shri Vidyaram Sharma

Pinku Bairwa Son of Shri Heeralal Vs State of Rajasthan

Shankar Lal Meena S/O Shri Ramu Lal Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Nanagram and Anr. Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp