High Court quashed the criminal proceeding in dissent on revisional petition, holding that no substantial doubt exists despite deletion of certain charges from the statement record.
Criminal proceeding quashed as no substantial doubt was found to justify quashing the proceeding on the basis of deletion of charge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 662/2018
----Petitioners Versus
State Of Rajasthan Through Pp.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vidhut Kumar Gupta For : Mr. Imran Khan, PP Respondent(s)
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Order
09/02/2022
;kphx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k ¼vkxs vfHk;qDrx.k dgk tkosxk½ dh vksj ls ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk fo}ku vij ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k] Jhek/kksiqj ftyk&lhdj }kjk ls'ku izdj.k la[;k 27@2016 esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 19-01-2018 ls O;fFkr gksdj is'k dh gS ftlds ek/;e ls nksuksa vfHk;qDrx.k dks /kkjk 342] 323] 324] 325 rFkk 308@34 Hkk-na-la- ds vkjksi ls vkjksfir fd;k x;kA
fo}ku vf/koDrk vfHk;qDrx.k dk rdZ gS fd vkgr f'kojkt ds dkfjr vf/kdka'k pksVsa rqPN o lkekU; izd`fr dh gSaA jktuSfrd jaft'ko'k dgkuh dks c<k&p<kdj izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA /kkjk 354 Hkk-na-la- dk Hkh vkjksi yxk;k x;k Fkk] ysfdu iqfyl us mls izekf.kr ugha ekuk gSA vkjksi fojfpr
(2 of 3)
[CRLR-662/2018]
fd;s tkus gsrq i=koyh ij dksbZ i;kZIr lkexzh ugha jgh gS rFkk eq[;r% /kkjk 308@34 Hkk-na-la- dk vkjksi ugha cuuk crkrs gq, vk{ksfir vkns'k vikLr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd dk rdZ jgk gS fd pksVksa dh izd`fr ds vykok vfHk;qDrx.k }kjk dkfjr dh x;h pksVksa rFkk mlds Kku rFkk vk'k; dks ns[krs gq, /kkjk 308@34 Hkk-na-ladk vkjksi Hkh curk gSA vkgr f'kojkt ds ,d pksV vfLFkHkax dh gS rFkk flj dh pksV /kkjnkj gfFk;kj ls gksuk crk;k x;k gSA vkgr vferk ds Hkh /kkjnkj gfFk;kj ls gkFk ij pksV dkfjr dh x;h gSA vr% vk{ksfir vkns'k rF; ,oa fof/kd izko/kkuksa ds vuq:i crkrs gq, fuxjkuh ;kfpdk [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
lquk x;k] izLrqr rdksaZ ij fopkj fd;k x;kA
ifjokfn;k vferk }kjk gLrxr izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ntZ djokdj ;g vkjksi yxk;k gS fd lqfer ds dgus ij og ukuxjke ds ?kj x;h] tgka ij mls dejs esa cUn djrs gq, NsMNkM dh rFkk ekjihV Hkh dhA mldk HkkbZ cpko gsrq vk;k rks mlds lkFk Hkh ukuxjke rFkk galjkt us ekjihV dh] lqfer us tc nkarys ls mlds HkkbZ ds flj ij okj fd;k rks mlus gkFk vkMk fd;k] ftlls mldk gkFk dV x;k] f'kojkt ds Hkh pksVsa vk;haA
vuqla/kku ds nkSjku ifjokfn;k vferk rFkk vkgr f'kojkt nksuksa us izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa of.kZr rF;ksa dh iqf"V dh gSA blds vykok Jherh fdj.k] vfuy dqekj] gfjflag] eatwnsoh] fotsUnz rFkk HkkxhjFk us Hkh mijksDr ?kVuk dh iqf"V dh gSA
bl izdkj miyC/k lkexzh rFkk pksV izfrosnu ds vuqlkj ;g izdV gksrk gS fd vkgr f'kojkt ds dqy 30 pksVsa
(3 of 3) [CRLR-662/2018]
dkfjr gqbZ] ftlesa ls vf/kdka'k rqPN o lk/kkj.k izd`fr dh gSa] ysfdu ,d pksV flj ds e/; Hkkx esa /kkjnkj gfFk;kj ls Incised Wound ds :i esa dkfjr gqbZ gSA izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa vferk us ;g Hkh dFku fd;k gS fd tc /kkjnkj gfFk;kj ls f'kojkt dks pksV dkfjr dh rks mlus viuk gkFk chp esa fn;k ftlls mlds gkFk ij pksV vk;hA ifjokfn;k vferk ds pksV izfrosnu ls Li"V gS fd mlds gkFk ij ,d Incised Wound ds :i esa /kkjnkj gfFk;kj ls pksV dkfjr gqbZ gSA vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa gR;k dh Js.kh esa ugha vkus okys vijk/k ekuo o/k ds iz;kl ds laca/k esa vkus okys vkjksi fojfpr djus ds ckcr~ i;kZIr lkexzh jgh gSA
bl LVst ij lk{; dk lw{erk ls foospu o fo'ys"k.k ¼Roving & Fishing½ vuqKs; ugha gSA miyC/k lk{; ds vk/kkj ij nks"kfl)h vf/klaHkkO; gS] bl vk'k; dk fu"d"kZ visf{kr ugha gSA fo}ku vf/koDrk vfHk;qDrx.k }kjk tks cpko fy;s x;s gSa] os fopkj.k ds nkSjku lk{; izfrj{kk dh LVst ij lqlaxr gks ldrs gSaA
bl izdkj fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k esa fdlh izdkj dh dksbZ fof/kd] rF;kRed ,oa {ks=kf/kdkfjrk laca/kh =qfV nf'kZr ugha gksrh gS ,oa gLr{ksi fd;s tkus dk dksbZ vk/kkj izdV ugha gksrk gSA
ifj.kker% ;kphx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr fuxjkuh ;kfpdk vLohdkj dj [kkfjt dh tkrh gSA
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
Mittal/41
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the sanctity of the recorded statement should be maintained when it contains no material contradiction or objectionable suggestion.
Whether the omission to frame charge under Section 354 BNSS in the initial statement vitiates the conviction that has already been convicted.
Whether the deletion of charge under Section 308 BNSS based on absence of material doubt justifies quashing the revisional order without contradiction.
6 provisions across 1 enactments
Nanagram S/o Shri Joruram
Hansraj S/o Nangram
State Of Rajasthan
Uma Shanker Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
