Partly allowed

Pratap Singh @ Sonu S/O Late Shri Rajkaran v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC13 Dec 2022SOSA/1603/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court suspended the sentence awarded to the appellant during the pendency of the criminal appeal on the ground that it would be just and proper, ordering his release on bail subject to furnishing a bond.

What did the court decide?

Sentence suspended pending appeal; appellant released on bail provided personal bond of Rs.1 lakh and two sureties of Rs.50,000 each are furnished.

Pratap Singh @ Sonu S/O Late Shri Rajkaran Vs State of… — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence

¶3

Application No.1603/2022

¶4

¶5

S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 2460/2022

¶6

Pratap Singh @ Sonu S/o Late Shri Rajkaran, Aged About 25 Years, R/o D-80, Narsingh Nagar, Jhotwara, Ps Jhotwara, Jaipur West, Jaipur

¶7

----Appellant

¶8

Versus

¶9

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Public Prosecutor

¶10

----Respondent

¶11

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Siya Ram Sharma, Adv. For : Mr. M.K. Sheoran, P.P. Respondent(s)

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Order

¶13

13/12/2022

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the parties on the application filed for suspension of sentence and perused the entire material available on record.

¶15

Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that accused-applicant was on bail during trial and his sentence has already been suspended by the learned trial Court. He further submits that final hearing of the appeal is likely to take time thus sentence of the accused-applicant may be suspended.

¶16

(2 of 2)

¶17

[SOSA-1603/2022 in CRLAS-2460/2022]

¶18

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer regarding suspension of sentence.

¶19

I have considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties.

¶20

Without commenting upon the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to suspend the sentence awarded to the applicant.

¶21

Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence awarded by the learned trial Court to the accused-applicant namely, Pratap Singh @ Sonu S/o Late Shri Rajkaran in Sessions Case No.45/2021 (183/2020) shall remain suspended during pendency of the appeal and he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- along with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before this court on 16^th January, 2023 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so.

¶22

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶23

DANISH USMANI /61

Pratap Singh @ Sonu S/O Late Shri Rajkaran v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pratap Singh @ Sonu S/O Late Shri Rajkaran v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jalim Singh @ Vishnu S/O Shri Harbhan Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Jasveer Singh S/O Jaswant Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramkumar Son of Bodanram Vs the State of Rajasthan

Deena Son of Shri Niroti Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Dhanni D/O Narayan W/O Ladhu Vs State of Rajasthan

Shaitan Singh S/O Late Shri Podisingh Vs State of Rajasthan