Appears to be an intra-court appeal wherein the appellant argued the original suit was disposed of. The High Court held the appeal infructuous due to subsequent developments and disposed of it accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1061/2014
Versus
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. J.L. Purohit, Sr. Advocate assisted by Mr. Sourabh Kant Vyas For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tejmal Ranka
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
20/10/2022
Learned senior counsel Shri Purohit submits that the original suit has been disposed of and thus, the instant appeal has become infructuous.
In view of the statement so made, the instant intra-court appeal is disposed of as having rendered infructuous by subsequent development.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J
(SANDEEP MEHTA),J
6-Divya/-
Ram Jeevan S/o. Bansi Lal
Rameshwar Lal S/o. Ram Jeevan
State Of Rajasthan
Doli Banam Mandir Asan Zileelav
Board of Revenue for Rajasthan
Revenue Appellant Authority, Pali
Sandeep Mehta
Kuldeep Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
