Pura Ram v. State of Rajasthan
Case brief
What is this about?
In a writ contempt petition regarding encroachments, the High Court, Raj. Jodhpur, noted the respondents' affidavit stating measures are being taken. The court discharged the rule and closed proceedings, leaving the petitioner liberty to revive if necessary.
What did the court decide?
Contempt proceedings closed. Rule discharged. Petitioner left liberty to revive proceedings if necessary.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
D.B. Writ Contempt No. 347/2021
Pura Ram S/o Sh. Choutha Ram, Aged About 67 Years, R/o Village Khokhar, Post - Khoksar, Tehsil Baytu, District Barmer (Rajasthan).
----Petitioner
Versus
- State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur (Rajasthan).
- Mr. Vishram Meena, The District Collector, Barmer (Rajasthan).
- Mr. Naresh Soni, Tehsildar, Baytu, District Barmer (Rajasthan).
- Mr. Rajesh Prajapat, Secretary Gram Panchayat, Khoksar, Panchayat Samiti- Gida Tehsil Baytu, District Barmer (Rajasthan).
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : | Mr. Muktesh Maheshwari Mr. Aidan Choudhary |
|---|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : | Mr. Sunil Beniwal, AAG, with Mr. Pranjal Mehta Mr. Shailendra Pal Singh |
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Pura Ram
- respondent
State Of Rajasthan
- respondent
Mr. Vishram Meena
- respondent
Mr. Naresh Soni
- respondent
Mr. Rajesh Prajapat
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- WCP/347/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court