The High Court of Rajasthan disposed of the writ petition as infructuous after the respondent issued belated appointment orders to the petitioners, noting that the claim for notional benefits would be examined separately following further representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9896/2020
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sushil Solanki For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sarvan Kumar for Mr. Hemant Choudhary, GC
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA
Order
25/07/2022
(2 of 2)
[CW-9896/2020]
(REKHA BORANA),J
16-TSingh/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition lies when appointments have already been granted to the petitioners despite delay.
Kamal Kumar Nagar and others
State Of Rajasthan
Rekha Borana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
