Petitioner's petition disposed without further orders due to a subsequent event. The decision lacks substantive reasoning or legal application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[CW-9482/2020]
(1 of 1)
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JODHPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9482/2020
M/s. Uday Events And Innovations
----Petitioner
Versus
Union Of India
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. P.S. Khinchi Mr. Mohit Khandelwal through V.C. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sandeep Bhandawat Mr. Rajvendra Saraswat
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Order
02/08/2022
As stated by learned counsel for the parties, in view of subsequent event no further orders are required to be passed. The petition is disposed off.
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),ACJ
50-nitin/deepika-
M/s. Uday Events And Innovations
Union Of India
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
Vinod Kumar Bharwani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
