The Court rejected a PIL seeking eviction of encroachers on pasture land. Directed the petitioner to file a representation before the District Collector via the Public Land Protection Cell (PLPC) as mandated in prior PIL judgments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9393/2022
Madan Singh S/o Sh. Narayan Singh, Aged About 75 Years, Resident Of Village Pirer, Post Jaitsisar, Tehsil Sardarshahar, District Churu (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. |
Naresh Kumar |
|---|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : - |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
15/07/2022
The petitioner has approached this Court by way of this writ petition (PIL) with the following prayers:-
“(a) By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondents Revenue Authorities may kindly be directed to immediately remove the encroachments made by encroachers over the Gochar Land in Khasra No.659 and gair Mumkin Paitan Land in Khasra No.662, 974/661, 975/651, 513, 249, 254 and 266 which are recorded in the revenue record of village Jaitsisar and gair Mumkin Paitan Land in Khasra No.126,253,49,181 and 348 of village Pirer, Gram Panchayat Jaitsisar, Tehsil Sardasrshahar, District Churu (Raj.) and impose heavy penalties on encroachers and same may be recovered from them.
(2 of 4)
[CW-9393/2022]
(b) By an appropriate writ, order or direction respondents may further be directed to restore the aforementioned land of Gochar and Paitan Land in their original shape.”
Having heard and considered the submissions advanced by counsel representing the petitioner and, having gone through the material available on record, we are of the firm view that the petitioner has available to him a suitable remedy for ventilating his grievances by virtue of the Division Bench Judgment of this Court in the case of Jagdish Prasad Meena & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. passed in D.B. Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No.10819/2018 decided on 30.01.2019 wherein this Court directed as below:-
“This Court is inundated with large number of writ petitions, styled as public interest litigation, from almost all the Districts of the State, with allegations of encroachment over the pasture land/ land of ‘johad’, ‘talab’/ river/river bed/public way/Shamshan/Kabristan etc. In all such petitions, common allegation is that despite repeated complaints/representations to the concerned revenue officers, no steps are taken by them to remove the encroachment. This results in number of writ petitions being filed by the complainants/representationists before this Court. This Court has been passing orders in such matters requiring the respective District Collectors to examine the factual content of the allegations and take steps to remove the encroachments so as to secure such land.
In order therefore to provide a pan-Rajasthan solution to this ever persisting problem, we deem it appropriate to direct the Chief Secretary of the State
(3 of 4)
[CW-9393/2022]
to devise a permanent mechanism, which should be operational in every District of the State where the concerned District Collector should be required to periodically notify for the information of the general public to lodge the complaints/representations with regard to such encroachments with a specially designated Public Land Protection Cell (for short ‘PLPC’) for rural areas. The PLPC should be headed by District Collector and function under his direction and supervision. The PLPC shall get such complaints/ representations enquired into by deputing concerned Sub DivisionalOfficer/Tehsildar/Naib Tehsildar so as to verify whether or not such encroachments have actually taken place on such land. If the allegations are found to be substantiated, appropriate steps in accordance with law be immediately taken for removal of the encroachments and appropriate penal action be also taken against the trespassers. The complaints/representations received in the PLPC should be decided by passing speaking order, informing the respective complainant/representationist about the action taken. This would obviate the necessity of such complainants/ representationists approaching this Court directly by way of public interest litigation. If this practice is put in place, this Court would not be inclined to directly entertain such public interest litigation or would do so only in the event of inaction on the part of the concerned PLPC. The PLPC aforementioned shall also keep in view the guidelines issued by the Supreme Court in Jagpal Singh & Others Vs. State of Punjab & Others, (2011) 11 SCC 396wherein all the State Governments of the country were directed that they should prepare schemes for eviction of illegal/unauthorised occupants of the Gram Sabha/GramPanchayat/Poramboke/ Shamlat land and the same must be restored to the Gram Sabha/Gram Panchayat for the common use of
(4 of 4)
[CW-9393/2022]
villagers of the village. The said scheme should provide for the speedy eviction of such illegal occupants, after giving them a showcause notice and a brief hearing. It was further held therein that long duration of the illegal encroachment/occupation of land or huge expenditure in making construction thereon or political connections of trespassers are no justification for regularising such illegal occupation. Regularisation should be permitted only in exceptional cases where lease has been granted under some government notification e.g. to landless labourers or members of Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes or where there is already a school, hospital, dispensary, ‘shamshan’, ‘kabristan’ or other public utility of the like nature on the land.”
Thus, the petitioner is relegated to submit a representation to the District Collector concerned, who shall assign the matter to the PLPC constituted under the directions of this Court.
The PLPC shall have a thorough enquiry conducted into the representation of the petitioner in light of the directions given by this Court in the case of Jagdish Prasad Meena (Supra) and decide the same within a period of six months from the date of submission thereof.
In case, any adverse order is passed, the petitioner shall be at liberty to challenge the same as per law.
The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J
(SANDEEP MEHTA),J
25-Devesh/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to approach this Court directly for removal of encroachments on Gochar/Paitan land.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Jagdish Prasad Meena & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.Relied on¶19
Jagdish Prasad Meena & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors., D.B. Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No.10819/2018
Jagpal Singh & Others Vs. State of Punjab & OthersReferred¶23
Jagpal Singh & Others Vs. State of Punjab & Others, (2011) 11 SCC 396 · Who else cites this
Madan Singh S/o Sh. Narayan Singh
State Of Rajasthan
District Collector (Revenue), Churu
Sub Divisional Officer, Sardarshahar
Tehsildar (Revenue), Sardarshahar
Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Jaitsisar
Sandeep Mehta
Kuldeep Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
