On an application by respondents stating accounts are settled, the writ petition is held infructuous and dismissed as per application.
Writ petition dismissed as rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6817/2011
Jotaram son of Shri Rawataram, by caste Bhil, aged about 68 years, R/o.Taleta, Post-Kailash Nagar, Tehsil Sheoganj.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : None |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Jagdish Vyas |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order
09/12/2022
The case comes up on an application (01/20) preferred by the respondents.
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the accounts of the petitioner have been settled and, therefore, nothing survives in the writ petition.
No body is present on behalf of the petitioner to controvert the submission made by learned counsel for the respondents.
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as rendered infructuous.
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J
84-SanjayS/-
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jotaram son of Shri Rawataram
Sub Divisional Officer, Sheoganj
MGB Gramin Bank
Vinit Kumar Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
