High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous because the petitioner informed the court that the underlying suit had already been finally decided by the trial court, rendering the current petition no longer maintainable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1 of 1)
[CW-6298/2018]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6298/2018
Nemi Chand S/o Shri Manga Ram, Resident Of Village Badu, Tehsil Parbatsar, District Nagaur.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vishal Sharma, on VC For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
02/02/2022
In wake of instant surge in COVID-19 cases and spread of its highly infectious Omicron variant, lawyers have been advised to refrain from coming to the Courts.
It is has been informed by counsel for the petitioner that the suit itself has been finally decided by the trial court and thus, the petition has become infructuous.
Dismissed accordingly.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J.
47-Sanjay/-
Nemi Chand S/o Shri Manga Ram
Mool Chand S/o Shri Jai Ram
Roopa Ram S/o Shri Jai Ram
Heera Ram S/o Shri Mukna Ram
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
