The High Court of Rajasthan dismissed a writ petition, ruling that the matter has become infructuous as the dispute between the petitioners and the respondent bank was settled via compromise acknowledged by the Debt Recovery Tribunal.
The writ petition was dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 594/2022
----Petitioners
Versus
Kogta Financial India Limited, Having Its Registered Office At Kogta House, Azad Mohalla, Bijainagar-305624, Rajasthan India And Its Branch Office At S-1, Gopalbari, Near Ajmer Pulia, Opp. Metro Pillar No. 143, Jaipur-302001, Rajasthan India Through Authorised Officer
(2 of 2)
[CW-594/2022]
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : None present. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Pankaj Gupta.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH
Order
15/11/2022
None present on behalf of the petitioners.
Counsel for the respondent submits that the petitioners and Bank have settled their dispute by way of compromise, mention thereof has also been made by Debt Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur in its order dated 23.02.2022. Copy of the order dated 23.02.2022 is taken on record.
In that view of the matter, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(INDERJEET SINGH),J
MG/110
Chigan Lal Jangid and others
Kogta Financial India Limited
Inderjeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
