The petitioner challenged a transfer order in a writ petition. The High Court dismissed the petition as infructuous because the petitioner had superannuated on 31.05.2021 prior to the filing of the writ.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3636/2021
Boraj Singh Bhati S/o Shri Shyam Singh, Aged About 59 Years, B/c Rajput , R/o Village Girab , Tehsil Shiv District , Barmer (Raj.) Posted As Circle Officer , Mawli Distt. Udaipur (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Ms. Vrinda Samdani for Ms. Vandana Bhansali, AGC
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
12/12/2022
Ms. Vrinda Samdani, assistant to Ms. Vandana Bhansali, learned counsel for the respondents, submits that the present writ petition, whereby the petitioner has challenged his transfer order, has been rendered infructuous, as the petitioner has superannuated on 31.05.2021.
In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.
(DINESH MEHTA),J
146-pooja/-
BORAJ SINGH BHATI
STATE OF RAJASTHAN
DINESH MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
