Allowed

Mahendra v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC12 Dec 2022CW/186/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of the writ petition relying on a coordinate bench judgment, directing the petitioner to submit a representation within seven days to the Director (Non-Gazetted), and expected the recruitment exercise to conclude by 31.01.2023.

What did the court decide?

Direction to petitioner to make representation within seven days; direction to Director to pass orders within two weeks; recruitment to conclude by 31.01.2023.

Mahendra Vs State of Rajasthan — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

¶2

JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 186/2022

¶4

Mahendra S/o Narayan Ram, Aged About 29 Years, Village /post Kantiya, Tehsil Khinwsar, District Nagaur (Raj.) Mobile No.7976095895.

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary , Medical And Health Services, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶8

Director (Non-Gazetted), Medical, Health And Family Welfare Department, Swasthya Bhawan, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶9

Chief Medical And Health Officer, Nagaur.

¶10

Joint Director, Medical And Health Services, Zone Ajmer, Ajmer.

¶11

----Respondents

¶12

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Yashpal Khileree For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shreyansh Mehta for Mr. K.S. Rajpurohit, AAG

¶13

JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

Order

12/12/2022

IA No. 01/2022

For the reasons stated and considering that the matter stands squarely covered by the judgment of a coordinate Bench of this Court, the application seeking early listing is allowed.

¶18

The matter is taken up for consideration today itself.

¶19

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 186/2022

¶20

Heard on the writ petition.

¶21

(2 of 3)

¶22

[CW-186/2022]

¶23

Learned counsel for the parties submit that the issue raised in the present petition is already settled by this Court in the case of Jagdish Prasad Nai vs. State of Rajasthan & ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1507/2022) decided on 26.05.2022 and therefore, similar order in the present writ petition may also be passed.

¶24

In the case of Jagdish Prasad Nai (supra), it was inter-alia directed by the Court as under: -

¶25

“In view of the above submissions made, the petitioners may make representation to the Director (Non-Gazetted) with regard to the calculation of their experience and consequential fact about their eligibility / award of bonus marks within a period of 15 days from today.

¶26

The Director (Non-Gazetted) would pass appropriate orders on the representations to be made by the petitioners within a period of four weeks thereafter.

¶27

The petitioners would be free to take appropriate proceedings, in case, they have any grievance qua the decision taken by the authority in this regard.

¶28

The respondents shall not conclude the recruitment before passing of the final orders as indicated hereinbefore.

¶29

It is expected of the respondents to conclude the entire exercise by 31^st of July, 2022.”

¶30

In view of submissions made, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is also disposed of with similar directions, which have been given in the case of Jagdish Prasad Nai (supra).

¶31

However, it is made clear that the representation be made by the petitioner within a period of seven days and the Director (Non Gazetted), Medical, Health and Family Welfare Department, would pass appropriate order within a period of two weeks thereafter.

¶32

(3 of 3)

¶33

[CW-186/2022]

¶34

It is expected of the respondents to conclude the entire exercise by 31.01.2023.

¶35

The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.

¶36

(DINESH MEHTA),J

¶37

153-Inder/-

Mahendra v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahendra v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sukhlal Vs Parvati

Bajrang Lal Bhati Vs Nath Mal and Ors.

M/S. Surya Associates Vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Daya Ram Vs the Union of India

Gautam Lal Patidar Vs State of Rajasthan

Boraj Singh Bhati Vs State of Rajasthan