The court held the writ petition challenging a notice under section 183B of the Tenancy Act as premature. It directed the petitioner to pursue the statutory remedy available after a final order is passed by the Tehsildar and dismissed the writ and stay petition.
The writ petition and the stay petition were dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 317/2022
Kamarlal S/o Shri Mangla Kalal, Aged About 68 Years, B/c Kalal, R/o Village Biladi, Tehsil And District Dungarpur.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Mathur For Respondent(s) : -
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
07/01/2022
(2 of 2)
[CW-317/2022]
(DINESH MEHTA),J
123-Ramesh/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the notice issued under section 183B of the Tenancy Act is maintainable?
Kamarlal S/o Shri Mangla Kalal
State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Revenue Department
The Tehsildar-Cum-Executive Magistrate, Dungarpur
DINESH MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
