Single judge order disposing of a writ petition seeking pay fixation and seniority benefits for a teacher. The court relied on a precedent and directed respondents to decide the petitioner's representation on these matters within three months.
Directed respondents to decide petitioner's representation on pay fixation and benefits within 3 months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18328/2022
Suman Sihag W/o Shri Sandeep Kumar Budaniya, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Vihar Colony, Churu, District Churu, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anil Bishnoi
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
06/12/2022
This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking direction to the respondents to make pay fixation of the petitioner equal to the similarly situated Teachers having been selected in
(2 of 2)
[CW-18328/2022]
the same selection process while stepping up the pay of the petitioner equal to him and that the petitioner may be granted benefit of seniority, promotion and other consequential benefits.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in similar nature writ petition filed at Jaipur Bench being Nand Kishore Sharma & Ors. Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writs No.12109/2018, decided on 18.07.2018 on the submissions made by counsel the respondents have been directed to decide the representation made by the petitioner therein and, therefore, a similar direction may be granted in the present case.
In view of the submissions made, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with similar direction as given in the case of Nand Kishore Sharma (supra), wherein, it was directed asunder:-
“In case, a representation is so addressed within the aforesaid period, the State-respondents are directed to consider and decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law. However, in no case later than three months from the date of receipt of the representation along with a certified copy of this order.”
The stay application also stands disposed of.
(DINESH MEHTA),J
168-Arvind/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to direct respondents to decide the petitioner's representation regarding pay fixation equal to similarly situated teachers.
Whether to extend the direction given in Nand Kishore Sharma to the present petitioner.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Nand Kishore Sharma & Ors. Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors.Relied on¶24
Nand Kishore Sharma & Ors. Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writs No.12109/2018
Suman Sihag
State Of Rajasthan
DINESH MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
