Petitioner filed a writ challenging tenure of a Sarpanch. Petitioner submitted tenure is complete; respondents did not oppose. Court dismissed writ as infructuous and disposed pending applications.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous. Pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14858/2017
Dhanraj Chaudhary Son Of Shri Radheylalji, Resident of Village Nonera Tehsil Kama District Bharatpur
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dhruv Atri (through VC) For Respondent(s) : Ms. Sheetal Mirdha, AAG (through VC)
Mr. Manoj Bhardwaj (through VC)
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order
02/02/2022
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the tenure of Sarpanch is complete. The writ petition has become infructuous.
The said fact is also not opposed by the respondents.
In the light of the same, the writ petition is dismissed as
having become infructuous.
All pending applications also stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J
Arun/44
Dhanraj Chaudhary
State Of Rajasthan
Divisional Commissioner, Bharatpur
Zila Parishad Bharatpur
Vikas Adhikari
SAMEER JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
